Calephelis wrighti W. Holland, 1930 |
||
Distribution and Larval Foodplants: Baja California, lower Colorado River drainage |
||
|
(From: A Catalogue of the Butterflies of the United States and Canada, Jonathan P. Pelham) Genus Calephelis Grote & Robinson, 1869 Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 2(3): 310-311. Type-species: Erycina virginiensis G. Gray, 1832, in Griffith, Cuvier's Anim. Kingd. 15(2): pl. 58, figs. 1, 1a (= Erycinia virginiensis Guérin-Méneville, [1832], Icon. Règne Anim. Cuvier (Ins.) 2(18): pl. 81, figs. 1, 1a; 3: 489 [1844]), by designation of I.C.Z.N. Opinion 755; the same Opinion placed this name on the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology as name no. 1694. = ‡Lephelisca W. Barnes & Lindsey, 1922 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15(1): 93. Type-species: Erycinia virginiensis Guérin-Méneville, [1831], Icon. Règne Anim. Cuvier (Ins.) 2(18): pl. 81, figs. 1, 1a; 3: 489 [1844], by original designation. I.C.Z.N. Opinion 755 placed this name on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Names in Zoology as name no. 1774.
Calephelis wrighti W. Holland, 1930 Ann. Carnegie Mus. 20(1): 5-6; cited W. G. Wright (1905), Butts. W. Coast: pl. 28, figs. 303 ♂ [not ♀], 303a ♂ D&V (holotype). Original Combination: Calephelis wrighti Type Locality: Not stated; suggested to be “near Mendocino” by W. G. Wright (1905) ibid.; defined as “the Coachella Valley” by J. A. Comstock (1935), Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 34(2): 148; subsequently suggested to be “oases in the deserts of Southern California, especially Riverside and San Diego Counties” by Tilden (1975), Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. (118): 30. Types: Holotype (#4357) in CAS. |
||
|
|
||
Top of Page ● Main Page ● Reference Library ● Literature List ● Citation ● Interactive Listing |
||