|
Phoebis sennae eubule (Linnaeus, 1767) |
||
|
Distribution and Larval Foodplants:
SE USA (strays far N, NW)
|
||
|
(From: A Catalogue of the Butterflies of the United States and Canada, Jonathan P. Pelham) Genus Phoebis Hübner, [1819] Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (7): 98. Type-species: Phoebis cypris Hübner, [1819], Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (7): 98, no. 1044 (and unjustified emendation of Papilio cipris Cramer, 1777, Uitl. Kapellen 2(9): 5, pl. 99, figs. E, F; (16): 148 (index); = Papilio argante Fabricius, 1775, Syst. Entomol.: 470, no. 116; synonym), by designation of Butler (1873), Lepid. Exot. (13): 155. = ‡Colias Hübner, [1819] Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (7): 99. Type-species: Papilio sennae Linnaeus, 1758, Syst. Nat. (ed. 10) 1: 470, no. 72, by designation of Hemming (1939), Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. (B)8(7): 136. Preoccupied by Colias [Fabricius], 1807, in: Illiger, Mag. f. Insektenk. 6: 284. = Callidryas Boisduval & Le Conte, [1830] Hist. Lépid. Amér. sept. (8): 73. Type-species: Papilio eubule Linnaeus, 1767, Syst. Nat. (ed. 12) 1(2): 764, no. 102 (= Papilio sennae Linnaeus, 1758, Syst. Nat. (ed. 10) 1: 470, no. 72; synonym), by designation of Blanchard (1840), in: Castelnau, Hist. Nat. Ins. 3: 432. = ‡Metura Butler, 1873 Lepid. Exot. (13): 155. Type-species: Callidryas bracteolata Butler, 1865, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1865(2): 458, pl. 26, fig. 6 (= Colias neocypris Hübner, [1823], Samml. exot. Schmett. 2: pl. [136], figs. 1, 2; synonym), by designation of Scudder (1875), Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci., Boston 10(2): 218, no. 695. Preoccupied by Metura Walker, 1855, in: Allen's Nat. Libr., Lepid. 2: 229. = Parura W. F. Kirby, 1896 In: Allen, Nat. Libr. Lepid. 2: 229. Type-species: Callidryas bracteolata Butler, 1865, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1865(2): 458, pl. 26, fig. 6 (= Colias neocypris Hübner, [1823], Samml. exot. Schmett. 2: pl. [136], figs. 1, 2; synonym), as a replacement name. Proposed to replace Metura Butler, 1873, preoccupied (Code Articles 60.3, 67.8).
Phoebis sennae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Phoebis sennae eubule (Linnaeus, 1767) Syst. Nat. (ed. 12) 1(2): 764, no. 102; cited G. Edwards (1760) Glean. Nat. Hist. 2: pl. 304. Original Combination: P[apilio]. D[anaus Candidus] Eubule Type Locality: “Carolina”; suggested to be “vic. of Charleston, South Carolina” by L. Miller and F. Brown (1981), Mem. Lepid. Soc. (2): 86. [Charleston County] Types: Type(s) apparently lost. Lamas (2004d), Atl. Neotrop. Lepid. Chcklst. Part 4A: 104, determined this synonymy. = drya (Fabricius, 1775) Syst. Entomol.: 478, no. 153. Original Combination: P[apilio]. D[anaus]. C[andidus]. Drya Type Locality: “America”; suggested to be “vic. of Charleston, South Carolina” by L. Miller and F. Brown (1981), Mem. Lepid. Soc. (2): 86. [Charleston County] Types: Type(s) probably lost. = ‡”pallida” (Cockerell, 1889) Entomol. 22(308): 5; cited French (1886), Butts. E. U. S.: 122. Original Combination: Callidryas sennae pallida ♀ Type Locality: Not stated. Types: “Type” is apparently lost. = ‡”lichas” (d'Almeida, 1922) Mélanges Lépid. 1: 56, no. 43; cited Boisduval and Le Conte [1830], Hist. Lépid. Amér. sept. (8): pl. 24, fig. 3 ♀ V. Original Combination: [Catopsilia Eubule] Form. aberr. Lichas Type Locality: Not specifically stated, but probably “Georgia” based on the figures by John Abbot in Boisduval and Le Conte. Types: Described, at least in part, from a John Abbot drawing. The specimens upon which this drawing was based are presumed lost. A “syntype” is in USNM, but Calhoun (2004), J. Lepid. Soc. 58(3): 156, discussed the dubious nature of such “types” from the Boisduval collection. = ‡”browni” W. D. Field, 1936 J. Entomol. & Zool. 28(2): 20. Original Combination: Phoebis sennae race eubule female f. browni Type Locality: “Lawrence, Kansas” [Douglas County] Types: “Holotype” in USNM. ‡”alba” Scott, 1986 Butts. N. Am.: 204, no. 50. Original Combination: [Phoebis sennae ♀] form alba Proposed as a “form” with no nomenclatural standing; a nomen nudum. ‡”rosa” Scott, 1986 Butts. N. Am.: 204, no. 50. Original Combination: [Phoebis sennae] winter form rosa Proposed as a “form” with no nomenclatural standing; a nomen nudum. |
||
|
|
||
|
Top of Page ● Main Page ● Reference Library ● Literature List ● Citation ● Interactive Listing |
||