|
Speyeria
mormonia luski (W. Barnes & McDunnough, 1913) |
||
|
Distribution and Larval Foodplants: |
||
|
(From: A Catalogue of the Butterflies of the United States and Canada, Jonathan P. Pelham) Genus Speyeria Scudder, 1872 4th Ann. Rept. Peabody Acad. Sci. (1871): 44. Type-species: Papilio idalia Drury, 1773, Ill. Nat. Hist. 1: 25, pl. 13, figs. 1-3 (1770); 2: index (1773), by original designation. = Semnopsyche Scudder, 1875 Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 2(4): 238, 258-259, no. 44. Type-species: Papilio diana, Cramer, 1777, Uitl. Kapellen 2(9): 4 pl. 98, figs. D, E; 2(16): 148 (index), by original designation. Grey (1989), J. Lepid. Soc. 43(1): 1-2, determined this synonymy. = Neoacidalia Reuss, 1926 Dtsche. Entomol. Z. 1926(1): 69. Type-species: Papilio cybele Fabricius, 1775, Syst. Entomol.: 516, no. 311, by original designation. = Mesoacidalia Reuss, 1926 Dtsche. Entomol. Z. 1926 (1): 69. Type-species: Papilio aglaja Linnaeus, 1758; Syst. Nat. (Edn 10) 1: 481, no. 140, by original designation. = Proacidalia Reuss, 1926 Dtsche. Entomol. Z. 1926 (1): 69. Type-species: Argynnis clara Blanchard, 1844; in Jacquemont, Voy. Inde 4 (Zool.): 20, pl. 2, figs. 2, 3, by original designation.
Speyeria mormonia (Boisduval, 1869) Annls. Entomol. Soc. Belg. 12: 58-59, no. 51; figured by Oberthür (1914), Étud. Lépid. Comp. 9(2): pl. 261, figs. 2192 ♂ D&V (lectotype), 2193 ♀ D&V. Original Combination: Argynnis Mormonia Type Locality: “sur les frontières de l'Oregon”; defined in error as “Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah”, in error, by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 22; suggested to be “vic. Pyramid L. Nevada” by L. Miller and F. Brown (1981), Mem. Lepid. Soc. (2): 145; subsequently defined as “Little Valley, W. of Washoe Lake, Washoe County, Nevada” by J. Emmel et al. (1998), Syst. W. N. Am. Butts. (2): 33; lectotype labeled “Lac Sal.” Types: Lectotype in USNM, designated by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 22; figured by W. Holland (1931), Butt. Book (rev. ed.): pl. 71, fig. 5 ♂ V, and J. Emmel et al. (1998), Syst. W. N. Am. Butts. (2): 33, figs. 249 ♂ D, 250 ♂ V. = ‡astarte (W. H. Edwards, 1862) Proc. Entomol. Soc. Philad. 1(7): 221-222, no. 1. Original Combination: Argynnis Astarte Type Locality: “Oregon; California”; defined as “Monache Meadows, Tulare County, California” by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 23. Types: “Neotype” in FMNH, designated by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 23; this is the lectotype of Argynnis arge (below). Preoccupied by Argynnis astarte E. Doubleday, 1848, in: Gen. diurn. Lepid. (1)(21): 181. = ‡montivaga (Behr, 1864) In: W. H. Edwards, Proc. Entomol. Soc. Philad. 3(3): 435, nos. 4 and 5. Original Combination: Argynnis Montivaga Type Locality: “always found in mountainous regions”; defined as “Monache Meadows, Tulare County, California” by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 23. Types: “Neotype” in FMNH, designated by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 23; this is the lectotype of Argynnis arge (below), making this name a junior objective synonym. Preoccupied by Argynnis montivaga Behr, 1863, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. [1]3(6): 84, no. 2. = arge (Strecker, 1878) Butts. & Moths N. Am., Comp. Syn. Cat.: 114, no. 210. Original Combination: [Argynnis] Arge Type Locality: “California”; defined as “Monache Meadows, Tulare County, California” by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 23. Types: Lectotype in FMNH, designated by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 23. J. Emmel et al. (1998), Syst. W. N. Am. Butts. (2): 33, determined this synonymy.
Speyeria mormonia luski (W. Barnes & McDunnough, 1913) Contr. Nat. Hist. Lepid. N. Am. 2(3): 95-96, pl. 1, figs. 1 ♂ D, 2 ♀ D, 3 ♂ V, 4 ♀ V. Original Combination: A[rgynnis]. eurynome luski Type Locality: “White Mts., Arizona” Types: Lectotype in USNM, designated by dos Passos and Grey (1947), Am. Mus. Novit. (1370): 24; a paralectotype figured by W. Holland (1931), Butt. Book (rev. ed.): pl. 56, fig. 6 ♂ V (as irene). Opler (1999), Field Guide W. Butts.: 282, suggested that this may be a species-level taxon. |
||
|
|
||
|
Top of Page ● Main Page ● Reference Library ● Literature List ● Citation ● Interactive Listing |
||